This is not a postcard to Chandler, it's just something I needed to say, for the postcards just scroll down - Part 1
Taking a break from trying to write creatively, I am going a bit political. I hope this will not be a lasting state of affairs.
I was recently watching some more of George Bush's elaborations and felt that I would like to voice my opinions on my own public forum.
I'll start out by saying that I am not supporting terrorism here. That being done, there is something one should say.
After WWII the big western muscles wanted to give the Jews a place to stay, why couldn't it have been in Europe where they were(the big western nations with their diplomacy and politics and 'we'll put the world right attitude' and 'the war to end all wars(what SHIT!!)' ? Why did they have to go pushing them into Jordan, Syria and Palestine, no wonder they protested! but yes, I don't support killing of innocent people, but America's nosy policy as the world's 'so called peace-maker' and 'watchdog' is rather bugging to the rest of us. Stop acting like big daddy for Christ's sake!! and I wish Donald Rumsfeld would take that hockey stick out of his ass!
"Okay. After WWII, Israel was established. We have to live with that, now. Should the US not help Israel when being attacked by Hezbollah?"
Israel is actually quite able to help itself. The U.S. tried helping out in Iraq and look what happened. It tries helping out on the India-Pakistan issue, and what do you have. For it's Afghanistan it seeked out Pakistan's help; I ask you?!?! One would have to be really dumb to not figure out who's behind the terrorist attacks in India that happen almost everyday. The U.S. had one 9/11, India has it everyday; does the world even remember the 45 sikhs that were masacarred in kashmir (lined up and just shot), Akshardham, the constant militancy in Kashmir(the undeclared war that India has been fighting since 1945). It's not a question of mine is bigger than yours but if there's one thing the U.S. should not have done is gone and linked with Pakistan( state sponsored terrorism if there ever was). Good's good and bad's bad. The whole game that the U.S. plays in south-east asia is support Pakistan, so India doesn't get strong; support India so China doesn't get strong; come off it, the U.S. doesn't give a damn if a few more trains in Mumbai got blown up.
And the U.S. has to get out of it's illusion that the changes it makes are going to be permanent. You cannot go barging into people's countries and try and make them live the way you wnat them to live. If you provoke them, reactions are going to take place, and then you end up with messes like Iraq(a war of justice indeed, ha! a war of oil more like it), Israel. But I'll say going aftre bin Laden and pulverising the Taliban was one good thing they did( ok they chose the wrong partners but they did it). So they should have stuck to keeping after him, till they found him and stuck pins into his behind(grenade pins and blown the bastard up as well), not lost interest like a 5 yr. old in a math class and gone running after Saddam in the middle of it all.
Hey, besides I like Israel. I am quite sure you've realised by now that I am Indian. They're really the guys India can identify with. If ever we had to choose a partner(may that day of final reckoning never come, I hope for world peace) I hope we go with them, not people who like living in the gray zone. In fact they're better than us at this terrorism bullshit. India's too soft. Sometimes one feels the army should just get into Kashmir and blow up those crazy bastards without caring about what the U.S. and the U.N. are harping on. If the U.S. agrees to help people do that and not dilly- dally politicizing the whole bloody thing, then sure they're welcome to help people out. But unfortunately, they're not so morally uplifted as they like to believe.
I was recently watching some more of George Bush's elaborations and felt that I would like to voice my opinions on my own public forum.
I'll start out by saying that I am not supporting terrorism here. That being done, there is something one should say.
After WWII the big western muscles wanted to give the Jews a place to stay, why couldn't it have been in Europe where they were(the big western nations with their diplomacy and politics and 'we'll put the world right attitude' and 'the war to end all wars(what SHIT!!)' ? Why did they have to go pushing them into Jordan, Syria and Palestine, no wonder they protested! but yes, I don't support killing of innocent people, but America's nosy policy as the world's 'so called peace-maker' and 'watchdog' is rather bugging to the rest of us. Stop acting like big daddy for Christ's sake!! and I wish Donald Rumsfeld would take that hockey stick out of his ass!
"Okay. After WWII, Israel was established. We have to live with that, now. Should the US not help Israel when being attacked by Hezbollah?"
Israel is actually quite able to help itself. The U.S. tried helping out in Iraq and look what happened. It tries helping out on the India-Pakistan issue, and what do you have. For it's Afghanistan it seeked out Pakistan's help; I ask you?!?! One would have to be really dumb to not figure out who's behind the terrorist attacks in India that happen almost everyday. The U.S. had one 9/11, India has it everyday; does the world even remember the 45 sikhs that were masacarred in kashmir (lined up and just shot), Akshardham, the constant militancy in Kashmir(the undeclared war that India has been fighting since 1945). It's not a question of mine is bigger than yours but if there's one thing the U.S. should not have done is gone and linked with Pakistan( state sponsored terrorism if there ever was). Good's good and bad's bad. The whole game that the U.S. plays in south-east asia is support Pakistan, so India doesn't get strong; support India so China doesn't get strong; come off it, the U.S. doesn't give a damn if a few more trains in Mumbai got blown up.
And the U.S. has to get out of it's illusion that the changes it makes are going to be permanent. You cannot go barging into people's countries and try and make them live the way you wnat them to live. If you provoke them, reactions are going to take place, and then you end up with messes like Iraq(a war of justice indeed, ha! a war of oil more like it), Israel. But I'll say going aftre bin Laden and pulverising the Taliban was one good thing they did( ok they chose the wrong partners but they did it). So they should have stuck to keeping after him, till they found him and stuck pins into his behind(grenade pins and blown the bastard up as well), not lost interest like a 5 yr. old in a math class and gone running after Saddam in the middle of it all.
Hey, besides I like Israel. I am quite sure you've realised by now that I am Indian. They're really the guys India can identify with. If ever we had to choose a partner(may that day of final reckoning never come, I hope for world peace) I hope we go with them, not people who like living in the gray zone. In fact they're better than us at this terrorism bullshit. India's too soft. Sometimes one feels the army should just get into Kashmir and blow up those crazy bastards without caring about what the U.S. and the U.N. are harping on. If the U.S. agrees to help people do that and not dilly- dally politicizing the whole bloody thing, then sure they're welcome to help people out. But unfortunately, they're not so morally uplifted as they like to believe.
posted by J at 10:09 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home